In
these days of guys who never fought in Vietnam
advocating a tricky engagement in Iraq, it is
interesting to see what George W. Bush did in
the military, how he misrepresented it, and what's
been done recently to make sure no one notices.
Mr. Bush, whose permission to fly was revoked
by the military (he was suspended, assigned to
a disciplinary unit and not allowed to fly military
assignments again) liked to portray himself to
voters as a "fighter pilot." But his
embellishments didn't stop there:
Date:
08/19/88 Houston Chronicle article by R. G. Ratliffe
"Asked
how he got into the Air National Guard, Bush said,
"They could sense I was going to be one of
the great pilots of all time."
Date:
1999 autobiography A Charge to Keep by
George W. Bush
Among the questionable claims in Mr. Bush's autobiography
is that he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam
"to relieve active-duty pilots." He did not volunteer
for service in Vietnam; in fact, he failed to
report for duty in his Air National Guard Unit
and skipped off to Alabama to work on a political
campaign.
In his book, Mr. Bush offers a lovely-sounding
(but bald-faced) lie to describe his F-102 fighter
pilot experience: "I continued flying with my
unit for the next several years," he writes, but
in fact he was suspended from flight duty in August
1972 and didn't fly at all for the last two years
of his service. (He also didn't show up for duty.)
Further along in his autobiography, Mr. Bush says
his military service "gave me respect for the
chain of command." Well, that is an odd way to
describe ignoring two direct orders to appear
for duty. He was then assigned to a disciplinary
unit in Denver, and he didn't show up for that
either.
During September 2002, CNN aired a prepared set
of videotapes glorifying the elder George Bush's
military career. Well, they certainly couldn't
glorify anything about the younger Bush's aborted
military career. But were these tapes also embellishments?
In one of the tapes, the elder George Bush describes
being shot down, companions killed, floating in
the ocean until a submarine luckily popped up
next to him, and in a remarkable coincidence,
it "just happened" to have a film crew on board.
That's why, the commentator explains without flinching,
CNN is able to show the actual footage
of George H.W. Bush's rescue.
No one is claiming that the elder George Bush
was not shot down, nor that he was not a hero.
But...rescued in the middle of the ocean by a
submarine that just coincidentally happened
to be carrying a film crew? Like the military
record for the younger George Bush, described
below, (last name torn off, with only the "W"
proclaiming that it is the record belonging to
George W. Bush...or is that Mortimer W. Snerd?)
one could wonder about the authenticity of the
lucky film captured by the lucky submarine, which
shows only a pilot in a helmet.
CNN (whose parent company, AOL Time Warner, had
just learned that it was the target of a new SEC
investigation) also spent an entire week running
a series of "just discovered" Osama bin Laden
tapes murkily explained to be from a trove of
over 70 bin Laden tapes that a CNN reporter "found."
Both the Bush Senior military tapes and the hand-picked
bin Laden tapes provided a Texas-sized helping
of White-House-friendly sound bytes, repeated
dozens of times a day. Happily for CNN, news of
the SEC report quieted down, not just on CNN but
everywhere. And, except for the Bush military
and bin Laden tapes and the fanfare surrounding
them, CNN's news was balanced.
"What
distinguishes the New Right from
other American reactionary movements
and what it shares with the early phase
of German fascism, is its incorporation of
conservative impulses into a system of representation
consisting largely of media techniques and media
images.
Philip Bishop: "The New Right and the Media"
But
we digress: Below, you will find photocopies of
documents (obtained through the Freedom of Information
Act, which the Bush Administration is now busy
gutting) showing that George W. Bush failed to
report for Air National Guard duty, was disciplined,
and was booted out as a pilot for refusing to
take a drug test.
In fact, George W. Bush evaded military duties
while thousands of Americans more patriotic
and less privileged than George W. Bush
were dying in Vietnam.
Senator Daniel Inouye: "'During my service,
if I missed training for two years, at the least,
I would have been court-martialed.' Senator Inouye
(Hawaii) has demanded that George W. Bush account
for missing two years of National Guard Service.
(see
transcript).
Senator Bob Kerrey: Governor Bush made
a six-year commitment...Well, if he's going to
do what's right, he ought to release his military
records, as John McCain did and let us know where
he was during that six year period of time..."
(see
transcript)
Where's
Waldo George?
News
Release: Help George W. Bush find 1972, 1973
George Bush has lost a year of his youth and needs
your help to find it. Between May 1972 and October
1974 George W. Bush seems to have lost:
1) A year of his service in the Air National Guard
(ANG)
2) His eligibility to fly F-102 jet fighters (See
photocopy, footnote 1)
3) The directions to his military doctor's office
4) The means to travel to his punishment detail
(2) to which he apparently never
reported, although he claims to have served the
final months of his enlistment there.
Lots of people didn't see George Bush, including
retired General William Turnipseed (3)
to whom young 1st Lt. Bush was ordered to report,
and the commanders of the Texas Air National Guard
Unit (4) in which he was supposedly
serving. You can imagine how disturbing this must
be to our unelected Commander-in-Chief
to have so thoroughly lost a year of his own military
service (5) when he plans to
ask young Americans to stick to the terms of their
military enlistments so he can send them to Iraq.
In October, 2000 two different Vietnam veterans
groups put up a total of $2000 in rewards for
anyone who could find George W. Bush's missing
year of National Guard service. (6)
So far no one has claimed the reward.
But
this was a long time ago. Any recent misbehavior?
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Mr. Bush
leaned on his self-described experience as a fighter
pilot to get himself elected governor of Texas.
See archives for Austin Statesman and Houston
Chronicle to read his embellishments about
his service as a fighter pilot.
In 1999, just prior to Mr. Bush's
announcement that he planned to run for president,
a record-scrubbing detail was dispatched to Camp
Mabry to make sure records in the archives matched
those in the autobiography published in 1999.
([synopsis: record scrubbing]
In 1999, during his presidential
campaign, Mr. Bush produced an autobiography (7)
containing several untruths about his military
service. He bragged about volunteering to go to
Vietnam (not true), tried to impress voters saying
he was a fighter pilot and "continued to fly for
several years" after training (not true), and
asserted that his military training taught him
to respect the chain of command (if so, he had
a peculiar way of showing it).
In 2000, reporters unearthed the
facts and published them in the Washington
Post, Boston Globe, AP wire service
and other print media outlets to howls
from Bush's people that it was unfair and "unethical"
to reveal facts just before the election. No television
news programs covered the story until nearly a
year after the election.
In October 2000, when the document
photocopies were posted on this web site, the
site was hacked out and the documents were made
inaccessible to the public (and the press) until
after the election news cycle ended, the weekend
before Election Day.
("How dare you bring these documents up in a time
of war?") Hmmm. If this web site hadn't been hacked
out to block media access to documents before
the election, voters would have known about this;
if George W. Bush had then been elected it would
have been with full disclosure and there would
be no point in bringing it up now. But then, that
would be protecting free speech.
In November 2000, during the vote
counting (or more accurately, vote not-counting),
an unauthorized monitoring system started gathering
data on Bush military document photocopies posted
at this web site. Using an automated program,
a "visitor" cycled from military document to document
on a prescribed schedule, every few minutes for
two weeks. The "visitor" never disengaged until
a technician from our web hosting company manually
dislodged it, at our request. The technician said
he'd never seen anything like it before.
In December 2000, after dislodging
the first "visitor," another unauthorized monitor
appeared. This lurker cycled from Bush document
to document at regular intervals, then broke the
connection. After 60 seconds it would reconnect
and repeat the process. This continued for a week,
when Talion.com dislodged it by changing all the
page addresses for Bush photocopy documents.
It's frustrating: At least when you're looking
for Waldo, you know he'll be somewhere in the
picture. George Bush didn't seem to have been
anywhere during his military years, but he seemed
to be everywhere when photocopies of his military
record appeared around election time. We must
ask:
Is
his a stealth military program? Does he fly below
the radar?
Of course, this could be all wrong. Although there's
no proof that President Bush showed up for military
duties between May 1972 and May 1973 (8),
there's a simple way for him to clear this up
before he asks young Americans to step into the
line of fire in Iraq. Simply release the records,
as John McCain did.
Private military records can only be released
with permission, but they contain the most essential
information about how he served the records
of commendations, comments by superiors about
the quality of service and the records of any
disciplinary actions or boards of inquiry. Public
military records, which have been released under
a FOIA request (9) indicate that
George W. Bush did not satisfactorily complete
his duties, was suspended and assigned to disciplinary
duty, which he also did not show up for.
"As the State Plans Officer for the Texas National
Guard, I was on full-time duty at Camp Mabry when
Dan Bartlett was cleansing the George W Bush file
prior to GW's Presidential announcement. For most
soldiers at Camp Mabry, this was a generally known
event.
The archives were closely scrutinized to make
sure that the Bush autobiography plans and the
record did not directly contradict each other.
In essence it was the script of the autobiography
which Dan Bartlett and his small team used to
scrub a file to be released. This effort was further
involved by General Daniel James and Chief of
Staff William W. Goodwin at Camp Mabry.
Bill Burkett contact: (915-673-0429)
[Transcript of Bill Burkett
interview]
The
facts about George W. Bush military record:
1) On September 29, 1972 Air National Guard orders
"suspending 1st Lt. George W. Bush from flying
status are confirmed...Reason for Suspension:
Failure to accomplish annual medical exam." (10)
2) Bush's initial temporary transfer to Alabama
was denied because "An obligated Reservist can
be assigned to a specific Ready Reserve position
only. (11) Therefore, he is
ineligible for assignment to an Air Reserve Squadron".
Nonetheless, Bush reapplied, was accepted by the
commander of the mail unit in Alabama, and moved
to Alabama to work on a Senate campaign, instead
of completing his military duties. He claims no
one exerted any influence.
3) According to a Boston Globe Story on May 23,
2000. "In his final 18 months of military service
in 1972 and 1973, Bush did not fly at all. And
for much of that time, Bush was all but unaccounted
for (12) For a full year, there
is no record that he showed up for the periodic
drills required of part-time guardsmen...From
May to November 1972, Bush was in Alabama working
in a US Senate campaign, and was required to attend
drills at an Air National Guard unit in Montgomery.
But there is no evidence in his record that he
did so. And William Turnipseed, the retired general
who commanded the Alabama unit back then, said
in an interview last week that Bush never appeared
for duty there."
4) The tattered piece of attendance record (which
lists no months, years, or last name) which the
Bush campaign presented as evidence of attending
Air National Guard training is not even from the
Air National Guard. This incomplete scrap of paper
is from the Air Force Reserve punishment unit,
not the Air National Guard. (13)
Note the ARF (Air Reserve Force) listing at the
top, rather than the ANG designator, which would
indicate it was from the Air National Guard.
5) In the fall of 1973, as an automatic disciplinary
action, Bush was reassigned to the Obligated Reserve
Section in Denver, because he disobeyed orders
to show up for a mandatory flight physical and
therefore was unable to fulfill the last two years
of his six-year obligation as an Air National
Guard jet fighter pilot.
Boston
Globe 11/5/2000 "APPARENTLY, BUSH BELIEVES
THE RULES DON'T APPLY TO HIM" By Thomas Oliphant:
"WASHINGTON IMAGINE YOU WANTED to be George
W. Bush's running mate back in July One
of the very first questions on the disclosure
form presidential campaigns supply is always a
simple, "Have you ever been arrested?" And another
demands from those with military records the places
and dates of every chunk of that service. In fact,
an accounting for every month of your life (as
with any job carrying a Top Secret clearance)
would be required.
" you tell Bush that you and your advisers
had made a conscious decision to withhold the
fact of a drunken-driving conviction when you
were 30 from the public. You say you had only
acknowledged a heavy drinking problem in the past,
and that while continuing to booze for a decade
after the arrest you had quit completely 14 years
ago. You add that you had decided to dodge all
details because you didn't want your twins to
do what you did.
"Now imagine further...the relentless Bush lawyers
had picked apart your military record (in the
National Guard) like crows on road kill, exposing
white lies and big gaps like whether you did a
lick of anything for the last year-and-a-half
of your obligation. As for the untruths and gaps
in your National Guard record and even your resume
and autobiography, you tell Bush that you've said
all you're going to say before the election on
this subject, that the records and your memory
are hazy, but that you're certain your obligation
had been fulfilled properly."
Sunday Times London (11/05/2000): "The
Bush camp was equally dismissive of a claim by
Bill Burkett, a former lieutenant colonel in the
Texas National Guard, that the governor's aides
had doctored his military record.
"Burkett said Bush aides had visited the National
Guard headquarters at Camp Mabry 'on numerous
occasions' to make sure that records available
to the public about his military service would
tally with his autobiography's version of his
time as a reserve pilot during the Vietnam war."
Air
National Guard Commanding Officer Alleges Bush
Military Records Cleansing
SUBJ: Military Records of George W. Bush
Clarification Bill L. Burkett LTC (ret)
Within the morning press reports in the London
Sunday Times and other publications, I am stated
to have alleged that the staff of George W. Bush
doctored [the key term] the military files of
George W. Bush in whatever attempt to cover his
military record.
Let me answer questions about my responses within
a chronological pattern:
Was this politically motivated and coordinated
with the Gore Campaign?
No. Not whatsoever. In no way did any member of
the Gore Campaign or any election official, Republican
or Democrat know my comments. My observations
were responses to questions of how the file was
developed; disseminated under the Freedom of information
Act (FOIA) and what was missing within the files
which would resolve the question of satisfactory
participation. These were my personal responses
to the asked questions that were not sanctioned
by anyone, nor shared with anyone. They were made
on the basis of my 28 year career, my working
experience within the senior staff at the Texas
National Guard headquarters and my knowledge of
the operational procedures of the US military
including the subject of personnel files of retired
or discharged soldiers and airmen.
Why, do you believe, you were contacted?
Question 3 will background how this occurred which
should be self-explanatory. The context of the
DUI story indicated the mishandling or failure
to fully disclose a past criminal record of Governor
Bush. I believe that the military record and the
irregularities that point to a possible extended
period of nonperformance and early release may
have also indicated a pattern of lack of full
disclosure by the Governor and his campaign. This
issue of military records had been highly visible
on at least two previous occasions within the
campaign, however, Senator Kerrey as an honored
and decorated SEAL most recently focused on this
issue within the last ten days I would guess that
within the eleventh hour and following the revelation
of the DUI story, the media and voters were waiting
for the next shoe to drop. This issue may have
been viewed as the next shoe.
In June of 1998 and with the full and personal
knowledge of Dan Bartlett and the Governor, I
reported problems of force structure, readiness
operational efficiency personnel and procedures
within the Texas National Guard. At that time,
and periodically thereafter, I have been in contact
with various [audio, video and print]news writers
and publishers. In 1998, I provided sufficient
detailed information including documentation of
severe irregularities within the Governors own
chain of command in an effort to correct those
deficiencies which I believe undermined the Texas
National Guard and in some cases broke the law.
How did your reference in this story develop?
I contacted a website that outlined the Governor's
personal military career irregularities and suggested
that there were two official documents that would
resolve the issue of satisfactory and honorable
service. Suddenly on Friday afternoon, my telephone
became barraged with media calls and messages
including those who had known of my previous whistleblowing
but had failed report it. I explained my background
and personal observations to each of them in minute
detail, often repeating the entire process for
clarity. I was extremely careful not to point
an accusing finger, but rather shape a question
which could resolve this allegation of integrity
that had clouded the Bush campaign since June
of 1999 the issue of his personal military
service.
Did you allege that the governor's staff doctored
the records?
No, instead I stated that the way this had been
handled by the Bush staff including knowledgeable
military officials at the Texas national guard,
that it left the implication that the Bush staff
had first incompetently provided an incomplete
military file for the Governor which was consistent
with his autobiography. I further observed that
they probably did not anticipate that the file
would be scrutinized to the level that it was.
Whenever someone determined holes is service big
enough to drive a Mack truck through additional
information [all of which was unofficial and some
in pencil notations] were then submitted to the
press to answer questions. I further observed
this "Trust me, I'm the Governor" approach had
worked throughout Texas for George W. Bush within
his tenure and the media had give the Governor
a free pass without the same scrutiny as the Vice
President until the eleventh hour revelation of
the DUI. But this still left the basic question
Why didn't Governor Bush simply release
his military pay files and retirement points accounting
records, which are the only OFFICIAL records that
will show that he satisfactorily and honorably
completed his service commitment?
Were there other issues that you discussed?
Yes. In each call, I, in essence scolded media
representatives for not doing their homework and
reviewing this information before the eleventh
hour. When asked if I would go on record, I said,
yes, I have nothing to hide even though I knew
that the mention of my name with the Bush campaign
would immediately strike a personal response because
of my whistleblowing in 1998.
Again, was this a Democratic ploy as stated
by Karen Hughes of the Bush staff?
No. Absolutely not.
Karen Hughes has again skirted the real issue
and question. Dan Bartlett and the Governor have
also refused to answer the basic question and
furnish the OFFICIAL files that will resolve this
issue. I am in no way linked to the Democratic
Party. I am simply an energized citizen and retired
soldier who would like to have the issues of each
possible commander-in-chief resolved prior to
the election, in order that we can escape holding
another American Presidency hostage to actions
and allegations by the opposing party in Congress.
We have suffered from this partisanship for the
past eight years. George W. Bush says that he
is the only candidate who can bridge this impasse.
This is his opportunity to start that process.
This is what I believe other Americans share with
me a sincere belief that they have the
right and capacity to make educated decisions;
but that candidates have the responsibility for
full and complete disclosure.
If you would like to speak with me personally
on the record I can be reached at
(915) 673-0429 in Abilene, Texas.
Please call in order to verify my signature.
Bill L. Burkett
LTC (Ret)
For
Interviews
More source information and interviews: For a
remarkable show or news story, interview former
Air National Guard pilot Robert A. Rogers and
researcher Marty Heldt as they lead you through
the 160 pages of documents uncovered in their
Freedom of Information inquiries into bush's official
military records. Find out why they think it is
imperative that Bush gives permission for the
release of his personal military records before
the election. Both Rogers and Heldt say their
research shows such huge holes in his National
Guard record Bush should release his personal
military records before he commits young Americans
to wartime conditions.
Go to http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm
to view Bush military documents released under
the Freedom of Information Act which show the
conflicting information that produced requests
to release his private military records. Voluntary
release of personal military records for the period
of his enlistment from 1968 through 1974 will
provide information to assess the following events:
1. A September 29, 1972 Air National Guard confirming
orders "suspending
1st Lt. George W. Bush from flying status
are confirmed...Reason for Suspension: Failure
to accomplish annual medical exam."
2. Bush's initial temporary transfer to Alabama
was denied because "An obligated Reservist can
be assigned to a specific Ready Reserve position
only. Therefore, he is ineligible for assignment
to an Air Reserve Squadron". Nonetheless, Bush
reapplied, was accepted by the commander of the
mail unit in Alabama, and moved to Alabama where,
instead of fulfilling his military duties, he
worked on a Senate campaign. http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc5.gif
3. According to a Boston
Globe Story on May 23, 2000: "In his final
18 months of military service in 1972 and 1973,
Bush did not fly at all. And for much of that
time, Bush was all but unaccounted for: For a
full year, there is no record that he showed up
for the periodic drills required of part-time
guardsmen.
"Bush, who declined to be interviewed on the issue,
said through a spokesman that he has ''some recollection''
of attending drills that year, but maybe not consistently.
"From May to November 1972, Bush was in Alabama
working in a US Senate campaign, and was required
to attend drills at an Air National Guard unit
in Montgomery. But there is no evidence in his
record that he did so. And William Turnipseed,
the retired general who commanded the Alabama
unit back then, said in an interview last week
that Bush never appeared for duty there."
4. In Fall 1973, as an automatic disciplinary
action, Bush was reassigned to the Obligated Reserve
Section in Denver, because he disobeyed orders
to show up for a mandatory flight physical and
therefore was unable to fulfill the last two years
of his six-year obligation as an Air National
Guard jet fighter pilot.
View Document photocopies:
First: Document
about George W. Bush, redacted for "administrative
reasons"
Second: Document:
Agreement signed by George W. Bush to accept military
flying assignments after training (reneged on
after disobeying orders)
Third: Document:
Order to suspend George Bush from flying for failing
to obey an order
Fourth: Document:
Evidence that George W. Bush was allowed to substitute
civilian duties (working on a senate campaign)
for flying duties following his refusal to take
physical and drug test
Fifth: Document:
Statement specifying disciplinary measures, signed
by George W. Bush
Sixth: Document:
Assignment of George W. Bush to disciplinary unit
in Denver
Footnotes
1 George W. Bush suspended
by military order. Official document
2 Enlistment
papers specifying punishments for not fulfilling
Air National Guard obligations
3 Boston
Globe Article Oct 31 2000
4 Two Texas
Commanders statements: they never saw him
during the 5/72-5/73 period. He was assigned,
perhaps through political influence, to a civilian
unit (during the war; his civilian duties consisted
of helping with a political campaign) after disobeying
an order.
5 May 2000 Boston
Globe article One Year Gap In Bush's Guard
Duty
6 Vets Want Proof of Bush Service,
Birmingham News October 2000 [article has been
archived or removed from web]
7 New York Observer: George
W.'s Troubling Flights of Fancy
8 Bush's Service Record, go to
archives for Oct. 24, 2000 in the Arizona
Daily Star
9 Lots more document photocopies:
To look at 30 pages of Bush's FOIA records go
here
10 Order suspending
Bush from flying.
11 Order Bush was not eligible
for transfer, tried again, perhaps with political
influence, and left for civilian duties before
his term was completed.
12 Another
Boston Globe article Oct 30 2000
13 Purported
proof of Bush's military service for 1972-73.
Document is nearly blank and does not identify
who it belongs to. Note that most of the dates
and Bush's name (except for the "W") have been
torn off.
Other sites with information, some more partisan
than others...
Washington
Post article, Nov 3, 2000
"The Bush campaign points to a torn piece of paper
in his Guard records, a statement of points Bush
apparently earned in 1972-73, although most of
the dates and Bush's name except for the "W" have
been torn off..." The article goes on to say that
the torn sheet of paper is shown as evidence by
the Bush people that he satisfied his requirements,
but that is contradicted by a written report signed
by two superiors.
Martin Heldt's Home Page on Bush's
Missing Years
Martin Heldt's Chronology
Background
Veterans that have requested proof of Governor
Bush's service during the years of 1972 to 1973
include the Alabama Vietnam Veterans and Viet
Vets for the Real Truth, and Senators
Inouye and Kerrey. In addition the Arizona
Daily Star, TomPaine.com
and The New York Observer have questioned whether
Bush actually served his required time during
the last half of 1972 and into late May 1973.
More Background: George W. Bush served five years
of his six-year Air National Guard obligation
between 1968 and 1973. However, 1972-1973 records
were redacted "for administrative reasons" and
have not been released. After undergoing two years
of expensive jet fighter training at taxpayer
expense, in April 1972, during the Viet Nam War,
George Bush simply quit flying. He did not show
up to take his required annual flight physical,
and the penalty he received was automatic suspension
of his right to fly and a final 15 months of disciplinary
action, for which he was demoted to the Obligated
Reserve Section in Denver.
Connecting the dots:
In April 1972, random drug testing was
implemented in the military.
Bush has previously stated that he had
not used drugs "since 1974."
Official verbal answer from Bush campaign:
Governor Bush "decided to not fly any longer"
so he did not take the required military flight
physical. However, as anyone in the military knows,
one does not simply "decide" to give up a military
assignment.
What difference does it make? Depending on the
nature of what's in those records, significant
problems could result if certain kinds of information
surface, including congressional investigations
of misconduct or influence peddling, or problems
enforcing disciplinary measures with soldiers
who commit infractions that may surface in the
records. But maybe there is nothing there. The
only way to find out is for Governor Bush to voluntarily
authorize the release of his private military
records.
What kind of records and procedures can be released?
Under
ordinary military circumstances, the suspension
of a pilot is directed through a military board
of inquiry. In Bush's case, if such a body was
convened, the records of its findings are not
in the public record. However, Governor Bush's
private records, which include disciplinary actions
and other relevant commentary, would provide clear
answers to the persistent questions.

Fair
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material
the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding
of environmental, political, economic, democratic, domestic and international
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|